Blog guideUpdated 2026-05-147 min readBy HubSecure Editorial TeamReviewed by workflow reviewers

Short summary

Skipping a DPIA when one is legally required is a direct GDPR violation — before any data is even processed. This guide explains who needs one, when, and what a compliant DPIA actually looks like.

  • What the workflow problem is.
  • What buyers should compare before choosing software.
  • How to move from research to workflow review.

Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA): When You Need One and How to Do It

Skipping a DPIA when one is legally required is a direct GDPR violation — before any data is even processed. This guide explains who needs one, when, and what a compliant DPIA actually looks like.

Written byHubSecure Editorial Team

Practical guides for secure client portals, RBAC, onboarding and regulated client operations.

Reviewed byHubSecure Security & Compliance Review

Reviewed for security positioning, workflow accuracy and implementation clarity.

Last updatedMay 7, 2026

Checked against the current HubSecure marketing site and product positioning.

TL;DR

A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is a systematic process for identifying and minimising the data protection risks of a new project, system, or change in processing. It is not optional when high-risk processing is involved — Article 35 of GDPR makes it mandatory, and failing to conduct one when required can itself attract regulatory action.

Related HubSecure buying path

AML/KYC & Onboarding guideclient onboarding softwareAML/KYC moduleSumsub comparisonAML/KYC compliance software guideGuide Librarybook a workflow demo

Related security, privacy and governance resources

Continue with HubSecure security and trust center, data processing agreement, subprocessors, compliance workflows, governed AI operator.

Related use case

This guide belongs to the Workspace Alternatives and Tool Consolidation Guides cluster. Continue with the product hub for workspace alternatives and tool consolidation.

When is a DPIA required?

A DPIA is required when processing is "likely to result in a high risk" to individuals' rights and freedoms. GDPR Article 35(3) specifies three cases that always require a DPIA:

National supervisory authorities publish lists of processing operations that require a DPIA in their jurisdiction. The EDPB has published criteria: if two or more of the following factors apply, a DPIA should be conducted:

Timing matters: A DPIA must be completed before processing begins. Conducting it retrospectively — after implementation — does not satisfy the requirement, and cannot undo a violation that has already occurred.

What a DPIA must contain

GDPR Article 35(7) sets out the minimum content:

  1. Description of the processing — what data, for what purpose, by what means, by whom
  2. Assessment of necessity and proportionality — is the processing necessary and proportionate to the purpose?
  3. Assessment of risks — to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, including likelihood and severity
  4. Measures to address risks — technical and organisational safeguards, with residual risk assessment

How to conduct a DPIA: step by step

Step 1: Identify the need

Screen the proposed processing against the criteria above. If two or more factors apply, proceed with a full DPIA. Document the screening decision even if you conclude a DPIA is not required.

Step 2: Describe the processing

Map the data flows: what personal data will be collected, from whom, how it will be stored, who will have access, what decisions will be made, and to whom it may be disclosed. Include sub-processors.

Step 3: Assess necessity and proportionality

Is there a less privacy-invasive way to achieve the same purpose? Could you use less data, anonymised data, or process data locally instead of sending it to the cloud? Document your reasoning.

Step 4: Identify and assess risks

For each risk, assess the likelihood and severity of potential harm to individuals. Harms include: inability to access services, financial loss, reputational damage, discrimination, identity theft, loss of confidentiality of professional privilege data.

Step 5: Identify mitigation measures

For each risk, identify technical and organisational controls that reduce the likelihood or severity. Examples: encryption, access controls, pseudonymisation, staff training, contractual safeguards, data minimisation.

Step 6: Document residual risk and decide

After applying mitigations, what risk remains? If residual risk is acceptable, you may proceed — and should document this conclusion. If residual risk is still high, you must consult your supervisory authority before processing.

Step 7: Involve the DPO and data subjects

Where a DPO is appointed, their advice must be sought. The views of data subjects or their representatives should also be sought where feasible (Article 35(9)).

Living document: A DPIA is not a one-time exercise. It must be reviewed and updated whenever the nature, scope, context, or purposes of processing change significantly — including when you adopt new technology or expand to new use cases.

Do SMEs need to conduct DPIAs?

Yes, if the processing meets the high-risk criteria. The obligation applies to all controllers regardless of size. The GDPR exemptions for SMEs relate primarily to the Record of Processing Activities (Article 30), not to DPIAs.

What is prior consultation?

If the DPIA shows residual high risk that cannot be mitigated, Article 36 requires you to consult your supervisory authority before starting to process. The SA has up to 8 weeks (extendable to 14 weeks) to respond with written advice.

DPIA templates and compliance documentation

HubSecure's compliance module includes DPIA templates, risk scoring frameworks, and document version control to keep your assessments audit-ready.

Book a demo

Reviewed for regulated teams

Prepared by the HubSecure editorial team for operators, compliance leaders and IT reviewers evaluating secure client operations software.

Authors · Reviewers · Editorial policy

Next useful pages

Continue the workflow evaluation

These links connect this page to the most relevant buyer, migration, template and signup paths.

secure client portalsecure document collectioncompliance crm for growing companiesmodules / sentinelguides
Canonical hubs

Source-of-truth pages for this topic

These hub pages tell buyers and search engines how this page fits into the wider HubSecure information architecture.

Recommended next step

Continue the evaluation path

The next page should move the buyer from information to comparison, workflow review, template use or private rollout readiness.

Official references

Sources to verify the compliance context

HubSecure content is written for workflow evaluation, not legal advice. Use these official sources to verify regulatory and assurance context.